I guess I've never really thought about what my views and beliefs are when it comes to animal testing. I know where I stand on eating animals, I'm pretty sure I know where I stand on hunting animals but, until this week, I never really had a stance on animal testing. After reading Singer's view, Cohen's view, and a little of Regan's view on animal testing I think that I am coming down on the side of Cohen. I don't think that animals should have rights because rights are a human construct. I do believe, on the other hand, that humans have obligations to animals because humans are moral agents and can decide whether or not the mis-treat other living beings. I also think that this includes us having moral obligations to other humans, which means that if medical testing on rats means that we are able to produce a vaccine for polio or a cure for cancer, we should do it. This does not mean that unnecessary animal testing should be conducted or that any type of animal testing that could also be thought of as torture is permissable. We must do our testing on animals as humanely and little as possble. Only when necessary for human health.